Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.8 | 82.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Samsung |
| Android 14 | Android 12, 11 |
| 2024-04-03 | 2021-12-03 |
| 6.30 x 5.62 x 0.19 inches | 6.48 x 3.01 x 0.35 inches |
| 7.73 ounces | 6.88 ounces |
| Black and White | Black |
| -- | Plastic and Plastic |
| $ 1915.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 8 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2480 x 2200 pixels | 1600 x 720 pixels |
| AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 414 pixels per inch | 270 pixels per inch |
| 4500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.5 | 7.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 700 MT6833V/ZA (7 nm) chipset |
| processor | Cortex-A76, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 16 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 750 GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 GPU |
| 6.3 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 17.6 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 23.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor | -- |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.87 | 10.34 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5700mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 7.36 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy A13 5G has a global score of 82.1, which is a little bit better than the vivo X Fold 3 Pro's 77.8 overall score. These devices include Android operating system, but Galaxy A13 5G has an older 12 version while vivo X Fold 3 Pro has Android 14 version. Although the Galaxy A13 5G is way older and a lot thicker than the vivo X Fold 3 Pro, it's design is still lighter.
The Galaxy A13 5G features a very superior processing unit than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, although it has 12 GB lesser RAM, they both have the same number of cores. Vivo X Fold 3 Pro counts with a much better looking display than Samsung Galaxy A13 5G, because it has a way better resolution of 2200 x 2480 pixels, a much greater pixel density and a larger display.
The vivo X Fold 3 Pro counts with a superior memory capacity for apps and games than Samsung Galaxy A13 5G, because it has more internal memory capacity. Vivo X Fold 3 Pro counts with a much better camera than Galaxy A13 5G, and although they both have a same resolution camera, the vivo X Fold 3 Pro also has a larger aperture to capture better captures in poorly lited environments and a lot higher 7680x4320 video resolution.
The vivo X Fold 3 Pro counts with just a little bit longer battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy A13 5G, because it has a 14 percent greater battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.