Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.8 | 76.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Samsung |
| Android 14 | Android 14 |
| 2024-04-03 | -- |
| 6.30 x 5.62 x 0.19 inches | 6.47 x 3.07 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.73 ounces | 7.05 ounces |
| Black and White | Blue Black, Gold, Light Gray and Light Green |
| -- | Plastic and Plastic |
| $ 1915.00 | $ 230.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 8 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2480 x 2200 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 414 pixels per inch | 385 pixels per inch |
| 4500 cd/m2 brightness | 800 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.5 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset | Exynos 1330 (5 nm) chipset |
| processor | processor |
| 16 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 750 GPU | Mali-G68 MP2 GPU |
| 6.3 | 6.03 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 17.6 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 23.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor | -- |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.87 | 9.46 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G) and LTE (4G) |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 9.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5700mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 7.36 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The vivo X Fold 3 Pro is a little bit better than Galaxy A16 5G, having a 77.8 score against 76.2. These phones work with the same Android 14 operating system, so both of them should provide you very similar operating system features. Vivo X Fold 3 Pro is a a little bit heavier but way thinner device than the Galaxy A16 5G.
The vivo X Fold 3 Pro counts with a bit faster processor than Galaxy A16 5G, and although they both have 8 cores, the vivo X Fold 3 Pro also has a larger amount of RAM. The vivo X Fold 3 Pro features a way better display than Samsung Galaxy A16 5G, because it has a much brighter screen, a just a little more pixels per display inch, a way higher 2200 x 2480 resolution and a larger display.
The vivo X Fold 3 Pro counts with a very superior camera than Samsung Galaxy A16 5G, and although they both have a camera with a 50 MP resolution, the vivo X Fold 3 Pro also has a larger aperture to take better low light captures. Vivo X Fold 3 Pro has a bigger storage to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Galaxy A16 5G, because although it has no SD memory card expansion slot, it also counts with 512 GB internal storage.
The vivo X Fold 3 Pro counts with just a little better battery performance than Galaxy A16 5G, because it has a 5700mAh battery size.
Although vivo X Fold 3 Pro is a better device, it costs a lot more than the Galaxy A16 5G, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as Galaxy A16 5G. So if you need that extra features and specs, you can buy vivo X Fold 3 Pro, otherwise you can save some money and get the Galaxy A16 5G, giving up some features and specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.