Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.8 | 77 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Samsung |
| Android 14 | Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2024-04-03 | 2019-10-05 |
| 6.30 x 5.62 x 0.19 inches | 6.43 x 3.05 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.73 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Black and White | Black, Blue, Green and Red |
| -- | Plastic |
| $ 1915.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 8 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2480 x 2200 pixels | 1560 x 720 pixels |
| AMOLED | TFT |
| 414 pixels per inch | 264 pixels per inch |
| 4500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.5 | 7.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 SDM450 (14 nm) chipset |
| processor | Cortex-A53 (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor |
| 16 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 750 GPU | Adreno 506 GPU |
| 6.3 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 17.6 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 23.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor | 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.87 | 8.91 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5700mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 7.36 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The vivo X Fold 3 Pro is slightly better than the Galaxy A20s, having a 77.8 score against 77. These phones work with Android OS, but vivo X Fold 3 Pro has a more recent 14 version while Galaxy A20s has Android 11. The vivo X Fold 3 Pro design is extremely newer and extremely thinner, but heavier than the Galaxy A20s.
The Samsung Galaxy A20s features a really superior processing power than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, although it has 12 GB less RAM, they both have 8 processing cores. The vivo X Fold 3 Pro features a way better looking screen than Galaxy A20s, because it has a lot higher 2200 x 2480 resolution, way more pixels per inch in the display and a bigger display.
The vivo X Fold 3 Pro counts with a much better camera than Galaxy A20s, because it has a way higher video resolution, a much higher resolution camera, a larger camera aperture and a lot bigger sensor. Vivo X Fold 3 Pro features much more memory to install games and applications than Galaxy A20s, because although it has no slot for external memory cards, it also counts with 448 GB more internal memory capacity.
The vivo X Fold 3 Pro features a much better battery duration than Samsung Galaxy A20s, because it has a 5700mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.