Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.8 | 84.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Samsung |
| Android 14 | Android 11 |
| 2024-04-03 | 2021-06-24 |
| 6.30 x 5.62 x 0.19 inches | 6.58 x 3.01 x 0.35 inches |
| 7.73 ounces | 7.16 ounces |
| Black and White | Gray, Mint, Violet and White |
| -- | Plastic and Plastic |
| $ 1915.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 8 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 2480 x 2200 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 414 pixels per inch | 399 pixels per inch |
| 4500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.5 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 700 MT6833V (7 nm) chipset |
| processor | Cortex-A76, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 16 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 750 GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 GPU |
| 6.3 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 17.6 | 13.02 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 23.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor | -- |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.87 | 10.34 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5700mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 7.36 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A22 5G is slightly better than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, having a global score of 84.6 against 77.8. The Galaxy A22 5G is an a lot older and way thicker phone than the vivo X Fold 3 Pro, but Samsung managed to build it just a little bit lighter anyway. Both phones we compare here include Android OS, but Galaxy A22 5G has an older 11 version and vivo X Fold 3 Pro has Android 14.
Vivo X Fold 3 Pro counts with a much sharper screen than Samsung Galaxy A22 5G, because it has a bigger display, a just a bit greater pixel number per inch in the screen and a way better resolution of 2200 x 2480px. The Samsung Galaxy A22 5G counts with an extremely better CPU than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, although it has less RAM, they both have 8 cpu cores.
The vivo X Fold 3 Pro has a much bigger storage capacity for games and applications than Galaxy A22 5G, because although it has no SD memory card expansion slot, it also counts with more internal memory capacity. The vivo X Fold 3 Pro has a greater camera than Samsung Galaxy A22 5G, because it has a back facing camera with a better resolution, a bigger aperture to take better low-light photography and video and a way better video quality.
Vivo X Fold 3 Pro counts with a bit longer battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy A22 5G, because it has 5700mAh of battery capacity instead of 5000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.