Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.8 | 79.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Samsung |
| Android 14 | Android 14 |
| 2024-04-03 | 2023-12-11 |
| 6.30 x 5.62 x 0.19 inches | 6.34 x 3.01 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.73 ounces | 6.95 ounces |
| Black and White | Brave Black, Fantasy Blue, Optimistic Blue and Personality Yellow |
| -- | Plastic and Plastic |
| $ 1915.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 8 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2480 x 2200 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 414 pixels per inch | 396 pixels per inch |
| 4500 cd/m2 brightness | 1000 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.5 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset | Exynos 1280 (5 nm) chipset |
| processor | processor |
| 16 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 750 GPU | Mali-G68 GPU |
| 6.3 | 6.12 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 17.6 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 23.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.76") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.87 | 11.11 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G) and LTE (4G) |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 9.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5700mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 7.36 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A25 5G has an overall score of 79.9, which is a little bit better than the vivo X Fold 3 Pro's general score of 77.8. Even though the Galaxy A25 5G and vivo X Fold 3 Pro were only released with a couple of months difference, Galaxy A25 5G's body is incredibly thicker but also lighter than vivo X Fold 3 Pro. Both phones we compare here have the same Android 14 operating system.
The vivo X Fold 3 Pro has a bit more powerful CPU than Samsung Galaxy A25 5G, and although they both have the same number of cores, the vivo X Fold 3 Pro also has 10 GB more RAM. Vivo X Fold 3 Pro features a brighter display than Samsung Galaxy A25 5G, because it has a just a little more pixels per inch of display, a really brighter display, a much better resolution of 2200 x 2480 and a bigger screen.
The vivo X Fold 3 Pro features a better camera than Galaxy A25 5G, and although they both have a same resolution back camera, the vivo X Fold 3 Pro also has a lot bigger sensor taking lot better quality videos and photos, a much better 7680x4320 video quality and a larger aperture to take better photos in low light situations.
The vivo X Fold 3 Pro features a greater storage capacity to store more apps and games than Galaxy A25 5G, because although it has no slot for SD memory cards, it also counts with 384 GB more internal memory. The vivo X Fold 3 Pro counts with a little longer battery life than Samsung Galaxy A25 5G, because it has 5700mAh of battery capacity instead of 5000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.