Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.8 | 79.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Samsung |
| Android 14 | -- |
| 2024-04-03 | 2019-03-02 |
| 6.30 x 5.62 x 0.19 inches | 6.24 x 2.94 x 0.30 inches |
| 7.73 ounces | 5.82 ounces |
| Black and White | Black, Blue and White |
| -- | Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1915.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 8 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2480 x 2200 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 414 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| 4500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.5 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7904 chipset |
| processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor |
| 16 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 750 GPU | Mali-G71 MP2 GPU |
| 6.3 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 17.6 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 23.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.87 | 9.46 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5700mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 7.36 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A30 is a little bit better than the vivo X Fold 3 Pro, getting a 79.6 score against 77.8. Even though Galaxy A30 is a lot older and extremely thicker than the vivo X Fold 3 Pro, it's design is still lighter. The Galaxy A30 features a lot better performance than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, although it has a smaller amount of RAM memory, they both have the same number of cores.
The vivo X Fold 3 Pro features a way better looking screen than Samsung Galaxy A30, because it has a way higher resolution of 2200 x 2480px, a bit more pixels per inch in the screen and a larger display. The vivo X Fold 3 Pro has a way bigger memory capacity for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy A30, because although it has no SD memory slot, it also counts with more internal memory capacity.
The vivo X Fold 3 Pro shoots much better photographs and videos than Samsung Galaxy A30, and although they both have a same size aperture, the vivo X Fold 3 Pro also has a much higher 7680x4320 video resolution, a way higher resolution back facing camera and a much bigger camera sensor capturing way better quality photographs.
The vivo X Fold 3 Pro has a superior battery life than Samsung Galaxy A30, because it has a 43% greater battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.