Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.8 | 81.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Samsung |
| Android 14 | Android 10 |
| 2024-04-03 | 2020-04-27 |
| 6.30 x 5.62 x 0.19 inches | 6.27 x 2.88 x 0.34 inches |
| 7.73 ounces | 6.53 ounces |
| Black and White | Prism Crush black, Prism Crush blue, Prism Crush red and Prism Crush white |
| -- | Plastic |
| $ 1915.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 8 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2480 x 2200 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 414 pixels per inch | 411 pixels per inch |
| 4500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.5 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset | MediaTek Helio P65 MT6768 chipset |
| processor | Arm Cortex-A75 and Arm Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 16 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 750 GPU | Mali-G52 MC2 GPU |
| 6.3 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 17.6 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 23.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.87 | 10.89 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5700mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 7.36 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A31 has an overall score of 81.3, which is slightly better than vivo X Fold 3 Pro's 77.8 global score. Both of these phones have Android OS (Operating System), but Samsung Galaxy A31 has the older 10 version while vivo X Fold 3 Pro has Android 14. Samsung Galaxy A31's construction is somewhat lighter than the vivo X Fold 3 Pro, but it is extremely thicker and was released 4 years before.
The Galaxy A31 has a much more powerful processor than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, although it has lesser RAM memory, they both have 8 processing cores. Vivo X Fold 3 Pro features a much better screen than Samsung Galaxy A31, because it has a much higher 2200 x 2480 resolution, a little more pixels per inch in the screen and a bigger display.
Vivo X Fold 3 Pro takes better pictures and videos than Galaxy A31, because it has a bigger aperture for better low light images, a back-facing camera with more mega-pixels, a much larger back-facing camera sensor which provides a lot better image and video quality and a much better video resolution.
Vivo X Fold 3 Pro features a much bigger storage capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy A31, because although it has no slot for an SD memory card, it also counts with 512 GB internal storage. Vivo X Fold 3 Pro has a bit better battery performance than Samsung Galaxy A31, because it has 5700mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.