Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.8 | 82 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Samsung |
| Android 14 | Android 11 |
| 2024-04-03 | 2021-02-25 |
| 6.30 x 5.62 x 0.19 inches | 6.26 x 2.90 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.73 ounces | -- |
| Black and White | Awesome Black, Awesome Blue and Awesome Violet and Awesome White |
| -- | Plastic and Plastic |
| $ 1915.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 8 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2480 x 2200 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 414 pixels per inch | 411 pixels per inch |
| 4500 cd/m2 brightness | 800 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.5 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset | Mediatek Helio G80 MT6769T chipset |
| processor | Cortex-A75, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 16 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 750 GPU | Mali G52 MC2 GPU |
| 6.3 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 17.6 | 13.02 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 23.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor | 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.87 | 10.67 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5700mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 7.36 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A32 LTE Only has a score of 82, which is a little bit better than vivo X Fold 3 Pro's score of 77.8. Despite of the fact the Galaxy A32 LTE Only is extremely older and notably thicker than the vivo X Fold 3 Pro, it's design is still incredibly lighter. These phones work with Android OS, but Galaxy A32 LTE Only has an older 11 version and vivo X Fold 3 Pro has Android 14 version.
The Samsung Galaxy A32 LTE Only counts with a much greater processing power than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, although it has less RAM memory, they both have the same number of cores. Vivo X Fold 3 Pro counts with a more vivid screen than Samsung Galaxy A32 LTE Only, because it has way more brightness, a little greater pixel density, a larger display and a way higher resolution of 2200 x 2480.
The vivo X Fold 3 Pro counts with a much bigger storage for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy A32 LTE Only, because although it has no slot for an SD memory card, it also counts with more internal storage. The vivo X Fold 3 Pro features a much better camera than Galaxy A32 LTE Only, because although it has a back facing camera with a way lower 50 mega-pixels resolution, it also counts with a bigger diafragm aperture, a lot larger back camera sensor capturing way higher quality photos and videos and a lot higher 7680x4320 video quality.
The vivo X Fold 3 Pro features just a bit better battery duration than Galaxy A32 LTE Only, because it has a 5700mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.