Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.8 | 82.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Samsung |
| Android 14 | Android 13 |
| 2024-04-03 | -- |
| 6.30 x 5.62 x 0.19 inches | -- |
| 7.73 ounces | -- |
| Black and White | -- |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1915.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 8 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 2480 x 2200 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 414 pixels per inch | 399 pixels per inch |
| 4500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.5 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 1080 MT6877V (6 nm) chipset |
| processor | Octa-Core 2600 MHz processor |
| 16 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 750 GPU | Mali-G68 MC4 GPU |
| 6.3 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 17.6 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 23.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.87 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5700mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Dual Nano SIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 7.36 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A34 is a bit better than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, getting a global score of 82.9 against 77.8. Samsung Galaxy A34's construction is extremely thinner and incredibly lighter than the vivo X Fold 3 Pro. Both of these devices work with Android OS (operating system), but Samsung Galaxy A34 has the older 13 version and vivo X Fold 3 Pro has Android 14 version.
The Galaxy A34 has a much better performing CPU than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, although it has lesser RAM memory, they both have 8 cpu cores. The vivo X Fold 3 Pro features a much more vibrant screen than Galaxy A34, because it has a quite higher screen pixels density, a bigger display and a much higher 2200 x 2480 resolution.
The vivo X Fold 3 Pro takes a lot better pictures and videos than Samsung Galaxy A34, because it has a larger aperture to capture better photos and video in low light situations, a way bigger back-facing camera sensor providing a lot higher image quality and a camera with more MP. The vivo X Fold 3 Pro has a superior memory capacity for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy A34, because it has 512 GB internal storage capacity.
The vivo X Fold 3 Pro has just a little bit longer battery lifetime than Galaxy A34, because it has 5700mAh of battery capacity instead of 5000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.