Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.8 | 79.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Samsung |
| Android 14 | Android 14 |
| 2024-04-03 | 2024-03-11 |
| 6.30 x 5.62 x 0.19 inches | 6.37 x 3.07 x 0.32 inches |
| 7.73 ounces | 7.37 ounces |
| Black and White | -- |
| -- | Plastic and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1915.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 8 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 2480 x 2200 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 414 pixels per inch | 390 pixels per inch |
| 4500 cd/m2 brightness | 500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.5 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset | Exynos 1380 (5 nm) chipset |
| processor | processor |
| 16 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 750 GPU | Mali-G68 MP5 GPU |
| 6.3 | 6.12 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 17.6 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 23.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor | 0.51 inches (1/1.96") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.87 | 11.44 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5700mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Nano SIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 7.36 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A35 5G has a global score of 79.4, which is a bit better than the vivo X Fold 3 Pro's score of 77.8. Both devices we compare here use the same Android 14 OS (Operating System). Galaxy A35 5G's construction is just a little lighter but incredibly thicker than the vivo X Fold 3 Pro, and both were released with only 1 months difference.
Vivo X Fold 3 Pro has a much more vibrant screen than Galaxy A35 5G, because it has a lot better 2200 x 2480 resolution, a bit better pixel density, a way brighter display and a larger screen. The vivo X Fold 3 Pro has a superior storage capacity to install applications and games than Samsung Galaxy A35 5G, because it has 384 GB more internal memory capacity.
The vivo X Fold 3 Pro features a bit superior processing unit than Galaxy A35 5G, and although they both have the same number of cores, the vivo X Fold 3 Pro also has a greater amount of RAM memory. Vivo X Fold 3 Pro shoots much clearer pictures and videos than Galaxy A35 5G, and although they both have a 50 MP resolution back facing camera, the vivo X Fold 3 Pro also has a bigger aperture to capture better low light captures and videos, a much bigger sensor which offers a much higher photo and video quality and a lot higher 7680x4320 video resolution.
Vivo X Fold 3 Pro features a little longer battery lifetime than Galaxy A35 5G, because it has a 5700mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.