Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.8 | 79.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Samsung |
| Android 14 | Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2024-04-03 | 2019-04-10 |
| 6.30 x 5.62 x 0.19 inches | 5.69 x 2.72 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.73 ounces | 4.94 ounces |
| Black and White | Black, Blue, Coral and White |
| -- | Plastic and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1915.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 8 inches | 5.9 inches |
| 2480 x 2200 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 414 pixels per inch | 437 pixels per inch |
| 4500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.5 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset | Exynos 7904 chipset |
| processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor |
| 16 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 750 GPU | Mali-G71 MP2 GPU |
| 6.3 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 17.6 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 25.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 23.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.87 | 9.46 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5700mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3100mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 7.36 | 5.12 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A40 is just a bit better than the vivo X Fold 3 Pro, getting a 79.6 score against 77.8. Even though Samsung Galaxy A40 is extremely older and thicker than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, it's body is still a lot lighter. These devices use Android operating system, but Samsung Galaxy A40 has 11 version and vivo X Fold 3 Pro has Android 14 version.
Samsung Galaxy A40 features a very superior processing unit than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, although it has a smaller amount of RAM memory, they both have 8 CPU cores. Vivo X Fold 3 Pro has a way better screen than Galaxy A40, because although it has a bit less pixels per inch of display, it also counts with a lot higher resolution of 2200 x 2480 pixels and a really bigger display.
The vivo X Fold 3 Pro captures much better videos and photos than Samsung Galaxy A40, and although they both have a F1.7 aperture, the vivo X Fold 3 Pro also has a lot higher 50 megapixels resolution camera, a much bigger camera sensor shooting much better quality pictures and videos and a much higher 7680x4320 video resolution.
Vivo X Fold 3 Pro counts with a very superior memory to store more apps and games than Galaxy A40, because although it has no slot for external memory cards, it also counts with 448 GB more internal storage. Vivo X Fold 3 Pro counts with a superior battery duration than Galaxy A40, because it has an 84% greater battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.