Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.8 | 81.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Samsung |
| Android 14 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2024-04-03 | 2020-05-15 |
| 6.30 x 5.62 x 0.19 inches | 5.90 x 2.75 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.73 ounces | 5.36 ounces |
| Black and White | Prism Crush black, Prism Crush blue, Prism Crush red and Prism Crush white |
| -- | Plastic and Plastic |
| $ 1915.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 8 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 2480 x 2200 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 414 pixels per inch | 431 pixels per inch |
| 4500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.5 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset | MediaTek Helio P65 MT6768 chipset |
| processor | Arm Cortex-A75 and Arm Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 16 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 750 GPU | Mali-G52 MC2 GPU |
| 6.3 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 17.6 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 25.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 23.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.87 | 11.33 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5700mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 7.36 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy A41 is just a bit better than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, getting an 81.7 score against 77.8. The Galaxy A41 is an a lot older and thicker device than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, but Samsung could make it way lighter anyway. Both of these phones include Android OS, but Galaxy A41 has the previous 11 version while vivo X Fold 3 Pro has Android 14 version.
Vivo X Fold 3 Pro has a much more vibrant screen than Samsung Galaxy A41, because although it has a just a little lower display pixel density, it also counts with a way larger screen and a lot better resolution of 2200 x 2480 pixels. The vivo X Fold 3 Pro features much more storage capacity to store more apps and games than Galaxy A41, because although it has no SD memory card expansion slot, it also counts with 448 GB more internal storage capacity.
The Galaxy A41 features a much better processing power than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, although it has a lower amount of RAM, they both have the same number of cores. The vivo X Fold 3 Pro features a better camera than Galaxy A41, because it has a bigger aperture, a way better 7680x4320 video definition, a more mega pixels camera in the back and a much larger sensor.
Vivo X Fold 3 Pro features a way better battery lifetime than Galaxy A41, because it has a 63 percent greater battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.