Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.8 | 86.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Samsung |
| Android 14 | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2024-04-03 | 2019-10-20 |
| 6.30 x 5.62 x 0.19 inches | 6.24 x 2.93 x 0.30 inches |
| 7.73 ounces | 5.86 ounces |
| Black and White | Prism crush black, Prism crush green, Prism crush violet and Prism crush white |
| -- | Plastic and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1915.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 8 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2480 x 2200 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 414 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| 4500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.5 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9610 chipset |
| processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 16 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 750 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 6.3 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 17.6 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 23.00mm focal length | 13.00mm focal length |
| 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.87 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5700mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 7.36 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A50s has a global score of 86.6, which is much better than the vivo X Fold 3 Pro's score of 77.8. Both of these phones use Android operating system, but Galaxy A50s has older 10 version while vivo X Fold 3 Pro has Android 14 version. The Galaxy A50s construction is way lighter than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, although it is much thicker and was released many years before.
The Samsung Galaxy A50s has a really superior performance than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, although it has a lower amount of RAM, they both have a Octa-Core CPU. Vivo X Fold 3 Pro features a lot better looking display than Galaxy A50s, because it has a lot higher resolution of 2200 x 2480px, a bigger screen and a just a little greater pixel density.
Vivo X Fold 3 Pro shoots much clearer pictures and videos than Galaxy A50s, because it has a lot bigger camera sensor capturing much better quality pictures and videos, a larger diafragm aperture to capture better captures in low light environments, a much better video resolution and a camera with a higher resolution.
Vivo X Fold 3 Pro features a much bigger storage capacity to install games and applications than Samsung Galaxy A50s, because although it has no slot for an external memory card, it also counts with 512 GB internal memory capacity. The vivo X Fold 3 Pro features a way better battery lifetime than Galaxy A50s, because it has a 5700mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.