Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.8 | 85.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Samsung |
| Android 14 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2024-04-03 | 2019-12-27 |
| 6.30 x 5.62 x 0.19 inches | 6.24 x 2.90 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.73 ounces | 6.07 ounces |
| Black and White | Prism Crush black, Prism Crush blue, Prism Crush pink and Prism Crush white |
| -- | Plastic and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1915.00 | $ 282.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 8 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2480 x 2200 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 414 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| 4500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.5 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset | Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset |
| processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 16 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 750 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 6.3 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 17.6 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 23.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.87 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5700mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 7.36 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A51 is a little bit better than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, getting a overall score of 85.5 against 77.8. Despite of the fact Samsung Galaxy A51 is a lot older and much thicker than the vivo X Fold 3 Pro, it's design is still notably lighter. Both of these phones work with Android OS, but Samsung Galaxy A51 has 11 version while vivo X Fold 3 Pro has Android 14.
The vivo X Fold 3 Pro has a much better looking display than Galaxy A51, because it has a just a bit higher pixel count in each display inch, a lot better 2200 x 2480 resolution and a larger display. The vivo X Fold 3 Pro features a superior storage capacity for applications and games than Samsung Galaxy A51, because although it has no SD card slot, it also counts with 384 GB more internal storage.
Galaxy A51 features a very superior processor than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, although it has a smaller amount of RAM memory, they both have a Octa-Core CPU. The vivo X Fold 3 Pro counts with a much better battery life than Galaxy A51, because it has a 43 percent more battery capacity. The vivo X Fold 3 Pro shoots much clearer photos and videos than Galaxy A51, because it has a lot better 7680x4320 video definition, a much bigger back-facing camera sensor taking more light and vivid colors, a larger diafragm aperture for better photos in low-light environments and a camera in the back with more MP.
Despite of being the best phone of the ones in this comparison, the Galaxy A51 is also very cheap compared to the other ones, making this phone a great choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.