Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.8 | 90.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Samsung |
| Android 14 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2024-04-03 | 2020-04-29 |
| 6.30 x 5.62 x 0.19 inches | 6.26 x 2.90 x 0.34 inches |
| 7.73 ounces | 6.60 ounces |
| Black and White | Prism cube black |
| -- | Aluminum and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1915.00 | $ 339.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 8 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2480 x 2200 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 414 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| 4500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.5 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset | Samsung Exynos 980 chipset |
| processor | ARM Cortex-A77 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 16 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 750 GPU | Mali-G76 MP5 GPU |
| 6.3 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 17.6 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 23.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.87 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5700mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 7.36 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy A51 5G is much better than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, with a overall score of 90.8 against 77.8. Both devices we are comparing here have Android OS (operating system), but Galaxy A51 5G has an older 11 version while vivo X Fold 3 Pro has Android 14. Even though Galaxy A51 5G is much older and a lot thicker than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, it's body is still lighter.
Vivo X Fold 3 Pro has a much better looking display than Galaxy A51 5G, because it has a larger screen, a little bit greater pixels count in each inch of display and a lot better 2200 x 2480 pixels resolution. The vivo X Fold 3 Pro counts with more memory to install applications and games than Galaxy A51 5G, because although it has no slot for an SD memory card, it also counts with 384 GB more internal memory capacity.
The Samsung Galaxy A51 5G features an extremely better processing unit than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, although it has a lower amount of RAM, they both have the same number of cores. The vivo X Fold 3 Pro has improved battery duration than Galaxy A51 5G, because it has 5700mAh of battery capacity. The vivo X Fold 3 Pro captures much better photos and videos than Galaxy A51 5G, because it has a way larger sensor, a larger aperture to capture better images and videos in low light situations, a much higher video resolution and a higher 50 MP resolution back facing camera.
The Samsung Galaxy A51 5G not only is the best phones in this comparison, but it's also a lot cheaper.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.