Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.8 | 87.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Samsung |
| Android 14 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2024-04-03 | 2020-01-31 |
| 6.30 x 5.62 x 0.19 inches | 6.44 x 2.99 x 0.30 inches |
| 7.73 ounces | 6.31 ounces |
| Black and White | Prism Crush black, Prism Crush blue, Prism Crush pink and Prism Crush white |
| -- | Plastic and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1915.00 | $ 411.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 8 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2480 x 2200 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 414 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| 4500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.5 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 SM7150-AA chipset |
| processor | Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 16 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 750 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 6.3 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 17.6 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 23.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.87 | 12.21 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5700mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 7.36 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy A71 is better than the vivo X Fold 3 Pro, having an 87.5 score against 77.8. Both of these phones include Android operating system, but Galaxy A71 has 11 version and vivo X Fold 3 Pro has Android 14. Galaxy A71's design is lighter than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, although it's a lot thicker and was released many years before.
The vivo X Fold 3 Pro counts with a lot better screen than Samsung Galaxy A71, because it has a way higher resolution of 2200 x 2480px, a larger display and a quite greater pixels density. Samsung Galaxy A71 counts with a really superior performance than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, although it has less RAM memory, they both have 8 cpu cores.
The vivo X Fold 3 Pro captures slightly better videos and photos than Galaxy A71, because although it has a camera with a lot lower 50 MP resolution, it also counts with a way larger camera sensor, a bigger aperture and a much better 7680x4320 video quality. The vivo X Fold 3 Pro has a much better storage to install games and applications than Galaxy A71, because although it has no SD memory card expansion slot, it also counts with more internal storage capacity.
Vivo X Fold 3 Pro has improved battery lifetime than Galaxy A71, because it has a 5700mAh battery capacity instead of 4500mAh.
In addition to being the best phone of the ones we are comparing, Galaxy A71 is also a bargain compared to others, making this phone a great choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.