Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.8 | 85.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Samsung |
| Android 14 | -- |
| 2024-04-03 | 2018-11-15 |
| 6.30 x 5.62 x 0.19 inches | 6.40 x 3.03 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.73 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Black and White | Bubblegum pink, Caviar black and Lemonade blue |
| -- | Glass and Metal |
| $ 1915.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 8 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2480 x 2200 pixels | 2220 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 414 pixels per inch | 392 pixels per inch |
| 4500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.5 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 SDM660 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 16 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 750 GPU | Adreno 512 GPU |
| 6.3 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 17.6 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 24.00 MP + 24.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 23.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.87 | 10.45 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5700mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3800mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 7.36 | 5.76 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A9 (2018) has an overall score of 85.2, which is slightly better than the vivo X Fold 3 Pro's general score of 77.8. The Galaxy A9 (2018) design is somewhat lighter than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, but it's much thicker and was released 6 years before. The Galaxy A9 (2018) counts with a much better hardware performance than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, although it has a smaller amount of RAM memory, they both have the same number of cores.
Vivo X Fold 3 Pro features a much better looking screen than Galaxy A9 (2018), because it has a bigger display, a bit higher pixels quantity in each inch of screen and a way higher resolution of 2200 x 2480. Vivo X Fold 3 Pro features a much better camera than Samsung Galaxy A9 (2018), and although they both have a F1.7 aperture, the vivo X Fold 3 Pro also has a much higher video quality, a lot bigger sensor taking way higher quality photos and videos and a back facing camera with a way higher 50 mega-pixels resolution.
The vivo X Fold 3 Pro features a very superior storage capacity for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy A9 (2018), because although it has no SD card slot, it also counts with 384 GB more internal memory. Vivo X Fold 3 Pro counts with a very superior battery duration than Galaxy A9 (2018), because it has a 5700mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.