Compare phones
Samsung Galaxy Alpha
AT&TSM-G850A
| Global Score | |
| 77.8 | 76.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Samsung |
| Android 14 | Android 4.4.4 |
| 2024-04-03 | -- |
| 6.30 x 5.62 x 0.19 inches | 5.21 x 2.58 x 0.26 inches |
| 7.73 ounces | 4.06 ounces |
| Black and White | Black, Blue, Gold, Gray and White |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1915.00 | $ 320.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 8 inches | 4.7 inches |
| 2480 x 2200 pixels | 720 x 1280 pixels (HD) |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 414 pixels per inch | 312 pixels per inch |
| 4500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 10.5 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 801 chipset |
| processor | Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2500 MHz) processor |
| 16 GB RAM | 2 GB (933 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 750 GPU | Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU |
| 6.3 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 17.6 | 5.8 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 2.10 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| 23.00mm focal length | 31.00mm focal length |
| 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor | -- |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.87 | 9.46 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5700mAh Li - Ion Battery | 1860mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| -- | 11 hours talk time |
| 7.36 | 3.76 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The vivo X Fold 3 Pro is a little bit better than the Samsung Galaxy Alpha, with a 77.8 score against 76.3. Both of these phones use Android OS (Operating System), but the vivo X Fold 3 Pro has 14 version and Samsung Galaxy Alpha has Android 4.4.4. The vivo X Fold 3 Pro body is extremely thinner but notably heavier than the Samsung Galaxy Alpha.
The Galaxy Alpha features a much greater processing power than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, because although it has 14 GB less RAM memory and lesser cores , it also counts with a graphics co-processor. The vivo X Fold 3 Pro features a way better screen than Samsung Galaxy Alpha, because it has a better count of pixels per inch of screen, a much better 2200 x 2480 resolution and a really bigger screen.
Vivo X Fold 3 Pro captures greater photographs and videos than Galaxy Alpha, because it has a camera in the back with lot more MP, a way higher 7680x4320 video definition and a much bigger aperture. Vivo X Fold 3 Pro features a much better storage capacity for applications and games than Samsung Galaxy Alpha, because it has 512 GB internal storage.
Vivo X Fold 3 Pro has a really longer battery performance than Galaxy Alpha, because it has a 206% bigger battery size.
Although vivo X Fold 3 Pro is a better device, it is way more expensive than Galaxy Alpha, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as Galaxy Alpha. So if you want that extra features, you can buy the vivo X Fold 3 Pro, otherwise you can save some money and buy the Galaxy Alpha, resigning a couple specs and features.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.