Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.8 | 76.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Samsung |
| Android 14 | Android 6.0 Marshmallow |
| 2024-04-03 | 2016-06-01 |
| 6.30 x 5.62 x 0.19 inches | 5.74 x 2.83 x 0.26 inches |
| 7.73 ounces | 5.04 ounces |
| Black and White | 16 777 216 |
| -- | Metal |
| $ 1915.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 8 inches | 5.2 inches |
| 2480 x 2200 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 414 pixels per inch | 424 pixels per inch |
| 4500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.5 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 617 8952 chipset |
| processor | ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Octa-Core 1500 MHz) processor |
| 16 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 750 GPU | Adreno 405 GPU |
| 6.3 | 8.73 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 17.6 | 10.02 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 23.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor | -- |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.87 | 9.13 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5700mAh Li - Ion Battery | 2600mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 7.36 | 4.56 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The vivo X Fold 3 Pro has a general score of 77.8, which is a bit better than the Galaxy C5's 76.4 general score. These devices include Android OS, but the vivo X Fold 3 Pro has an older 14 version and Galaxy C5 has Android 6.0 Marshmallow. The vivo X Fold 3 Pro construction is a lot newer and thinner, but extremely heavier than Galaxy C5.
The vivo X Fold 3 Pro features a way better display than Samsung Galaxy C5, because although it has a just a bit worse pixels density, it also counts with a much higher resolution of 2200 x 2480 pixels and a way bigger display. The vivo X Fold 3 Pro has a very superior storage for games and applications than Galaxy C5, because although it has no slot for an external memory card, it also counts with 512 GB internal memory capacity.
Galaxy C5 has a very superior processor than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, although it has 12 GB lesser RAM, they both have 8 CPU cores. Vivo X Fold 3 Pro has a very superior battery duration than Galaxy C5, because it has a 5700mAh battery capacity. Vivo X Fold 3 Pro features a greater camera than Galaxy C5, because it has a much higher 7680x4320 video resolution, a bigger diafragm aperture for better low-light captures and videos and a camera with way more megapixels.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.