Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.8 | 84.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Samsung |
| Android 14 | Android 12 |
| 2024-04-03 | 2022-03-22 |
| 6.30 x 5.62 x 0.19 inches | 6.52 x 3.03 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.73 ounces | -- |
| Black and White | Aqua Blue and Forest Green |
| -- | Plastic and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1915.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 8 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 2480 x 2200 pixels | 2408 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 414 pixels per inch | 400 pixels per inch |
| 4500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.5 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G SM7225 (8 nm) chipset |
| processor | Octa-Core 2200 MHz processor |
| 16 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 750 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 6.3 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 17.6 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 23.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor | -- |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.87 | 9.35 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5700mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Nano SIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 7.36 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy F23 is a bit better than the vivo X Fold 3 Pro, having an 84.6 score against 77.8. Both devices we are comparing work with Android operating system, but the Samsung Galaxy F23 has the older 12 version while vivo X Fold 3 Pro has Android 14 version. Samsung Galaxy F23's design is incredibly lighter than the vivo X Fold 3 Pro, although it is thicker and was released 2 years before.
Vivo X Fold 3 Pro features an incredibly better looking display than Samsung Galaxy F23, because it has a larger screen, a lot better resolution of 2200 x 2480 pixels and a just a bit greater count of pixels per inch in the screen. Galaxy F23 features a much better processing power than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, although it has a smaller amount of RAM, they both have the same number of cores.
The vivo X Fold 3 Pro counts with a very superior camera than Galaxy F23, and although they both have a 50 MP camera, the vivo X Fold 3 Pro also has a bigger aperture for better low light photos and video. The vivo X Fold 3 Pro counts with much more storage to store more apps and games than Samsung Galaxy F23, because it has 512 GB internal memory.
The vivo X Fold 3 Pro has just a bit better battery performance than Samsung Galaxy F23, because it has 5700mAh of battery capacity against 5000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.