Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.8 | 85.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Samsung |
| Android 14 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2024-04-03 | 2020-10-16 |
| 6.30 x 5.62 x 0.19 inches | 6.27 x 2.96 x 0.35 inches |
| 7.73 ounces | 6.74 ounces |
| Black and White | Fusion black, Fusion blue and Fusion green |
| $ 1915.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 8 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2480 x 2200 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 414 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| 4500 cd/m2 brightness | 420 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.5 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset | Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset |
| processor | Arm Cortex-A73 and Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 16 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 750 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 6.3 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 17.6 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 23.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.87 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5700mAh Li - Ion Battery | 6000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 7.36 | 7.52 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy F41 has a general score of 85.2, which is slightly better than the vivo X Fold 3 Pro's 77.8 global score. Galaxy F41's construction is somewhat lighter than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, but it is a lot thicker and was released 4 years before. These phones use Android OS, but Galaxy F41 has the older 11 version while vivo X Fold 3 Pro has Android 14 version.
Vivo X Fold 3 Pro has a way better looking display than Galaxy F41, because it has a much better 2200 x 2480px resolution, a much brighter display, a bigger display and a just a little greater pixel density. Galaxy F41 has a very superior processing power than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, although it has a lower amount of RAM memory, they both have 8 cpu cores.
The vivo X Fold 3 Pro shoots a bit better photographs and videos than Galaxy F41, because although it has a lot lower resolution back-facing camera, it also counts with a way better 7680x4320 video quality, a larger camera aperture to capture better images in low light situations and a much larger back camera sensor providing a lot better image quality.
The vivo X Fold 3 Pro has a way bigger storage capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Galaxy F41, because although it has no slot for external memory cards, it also counts with more internal storage capacity. Galaxy F41 has just a little bit longer battery duration than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, because it has a 5 percent more battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.