Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.8 | 97.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Samsung |
| Android 14 | Android 9.0 Pie |
| 2024-04-03 | 2019-09-27 |
| 6.30 x 5.62 x 0.19 inches | 6.33 x 4.64 x 0.27 inches |
| 7.73 ounces | 9.74 ounces |
| Black and White | Cosmos black and Space silver |
| $ 1915.00 | $ 1980.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 8 inches | 7.3 inches |
| 2480 x 2200 pixels | 2152 x 1536 pixels |
| AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 414 pixels per inch | 362 pixels per inch |
| 4500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.5 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 16 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 750 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 6.3 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 17.6 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 23.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.87 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5700mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4380mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 7.36 | 6.24 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Fold has a general score of 97.6, which is much better than vivo X Fold 3 Pro's 77.8 overall score. Both of these devices include Android OS, but Samsung Galaxy Fold has the newer 9.0 Pie version and vivo X Fold 3 Pro has Android 14. Even though Samsung Galaxy Fold is better than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, it must be told that it is also way older, much heavier and extremely thicker.
Vivo X Fold 3 Pro features an incredibly better looking display than Galaxy Fold, because it has a little larger display, a just a bit higher screen density and a higher resolution of 2200 x 2480 pixels. Galaxy Fold's memory for apps and games is just as good as vivo X Fold 3 Pro's one, both of them have equal 512 GB internal memory capacity.
The Galaxy Fold counts with a very superior performance than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, although it has a lower amount of RAM memory, they both have the same number of cores. Vivo X Fold 3 Pro has better battery duration than Galaxy Fold, because it has a 30% bigger battery capacity. Vivo X Fold 3 Pro counts with a greater camera than Galaxy Fold, because although it has a tinier aperture, it also counts with a much bigger sensor which gives a much better image and video quality, a much better video quality and a way higher 50 mega-pixels resolution back camera.
The Galaxy Fold costs a bit more money than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, but it's still a great deal, as you can get a lot more for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.