Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.8 | 76.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Samsung |
| Android 14 | Android 7.0 Nougat |
| 2024-04-03 | 2017-06-20 |
| 6.30 x 5.62 x 0.19 inches | 6.17 x 3.10 x 0.32 inches |
| 7.73 ounces | 6.31 ounces |
| Black and White | 16 777 216 |
| -- | Aluminum |
| $ 1915.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 8 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2480 x 2200 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 414 pixels per inch | 386 pixels per inch |
| 4500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.5 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset | MediaTek Helio P20 MT6757 chipset |
| processor | ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 16 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 16 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 750 GPU | Mali-T880 MP2 GPU |
| 6.3 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 17.6 | 8.88 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 13.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 23.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor | -- |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.87 | 9.02 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5700mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3300mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 7.36 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Vivo X Fold 3 Pro has a global score of 77.8, which is a bit better than Galaxy J7 Max's overall score of 76.1. These phones have Android OS, but the vivo X Fold 3 Pro has older 14 version while Galaxy J7 Max has Android 7.0 Nougat. The vivo X Fold 3 Pro construction is a lot newer and notably thinner, but also somewhat heavier than Galaxy J7 Max.
The Galaxy J7 Max has a lot better hardware performance than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, although it has less RAM, they both have 8 processing cores. Vivo X Fold 3 Pro has a much more vibrant display than Samsung Galaxy J7 Max, because it has a much better 2200 x 2480 resolution, a much larger display and a quite better pixels amount per inch in the screen.
Vivo X Fold 3 Pro has a much better storage for apps and games than Samsung Galaxy J7 Max, because although it has no SD memory slot, it also counts with 512 GB internal storage capacity. Vivo X Fold 3 Pro counts with a really longer battery life than Samsung Galaxy J7 Max, because it has 5700mAh of battery capacity.
Vivo X Fold 3 Pro shoots greater videos and photos than Samsung Galaxy J7 Max, and although they both have the same camera aperture, the vivo X Fold 3 Pro also has a back-facing camera with way more MP and a way better video quality.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.