Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.8 | 80 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Samsung |
| Android 14 | Android 10 |
| 2024-04-03 | 2021-03-18 |
| 6.30 x 5.62 x 0.19 inches | 6.46 x 2.99 x 0.38 inches |
| 7.73 ounces | 7.80 ounces |
| Black and White | Black, blue and white |
| -- | Plastic and Plastic |
| $ 1915.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 8 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2480 x 2200 pixels | 1600 x 720 pixels |
| AMOLED | PLS |
| 414 pixels per inch | 270 pixels per inch |
| 4500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.5 | 7.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset | Samsung Exynos 850 S5E3830 chipset |
| processor | Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 16 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 750 GPU | Mali-G52 MP1 GPU |
| 6.3 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 17.6 | 13.02 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 23.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor | -- |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.87 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5700mAh Li - Ion Battery | 6000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 7.36 | 7.52 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy M12 is a bit better than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, with an 80 score against 77.8. Both devices in this comparison work with Android operating system, but Galaxy M12 has 10 version while vivo X Fold 3 Pro has Android 14. Although the Galaxy M12 is a better device than the vivo X Fold 3 Pro, we must tell that it is also an extremely older, a bit heavier and much thicker device.
The Samsung Galaxy M12 features a really superior performance than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, although it has 12 GB less RAM memory, they both have the same number of cores. Vivo X Fold 3 Pro has a much sharper screen than Galaxy M12, because it has a bigger display, a lot higher 2200 x 2480 resolution and way more pixels per screen inch.
The vivo X Fold 3 Pro captures a lot better photos and videos than Galaxy M12, because it has a bigger aperture, a much better video resolution and a better 50 mega-pixels resolution back camera. Vivo X Fold 3 Pro counts with a very superior storage for apps and games than Samsung Galaxy M12, because although it has no slot for external memory cards, it also counts with more internal storage capacity.
Samsung Galaxy M12 counts with just a little better battery life than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, because it has a 5 percent more battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.