Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.8 | 81.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Samsung |
| Android 14 | Android 12 |
| 2024-04-03 | 2022-07-01 |
| 6.30 x 5.62 x 0.19 inches | 6.51 x 3.03 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.73 ounces | 6.77 ounces |
| Black and White | Deep Green, Light Blue and Orange Copper |
| -- | Plastic and Plastic |
| $ 1915.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 8 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 2480 x 2200 pixels | 2408 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | LCD |
| 414 pixels per inch | 400 pixels per inch |
| 4500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.5 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset | Exynos 850 (8 nm) chipset |
| processor | Octa-Core 4000 MHz processor |
| 16 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 750 GPU | Mali-G52 GPU |
| 6.3 | 9.99 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 17.6 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 23.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor | -- |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.87 | 9.35 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5700mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 7.36 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy M13 has a global score of 81.1, which is slightly better than vivo X Fold 3 Pro's general score of 77.8. Both of these devices work with Android operating system, but the Samsung Galaxy M13 has the older 12 version and vivo X Fold 3 Pro has Android 14. Samsung Galaxy M13 is an older and way thicker phone than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, but Samsung managed to build it somewhat lighter anyway.
The vivo X Fold 3 Pro has a much sharper display than Galaxy M13, because it has a lot better resolution of 2200 x 2480px, a larger screen and a just a little better amount of pixels per display inch. The vivo X Fold 3 Pro counts with a very superior storage to install games and applications than Samsung Galaxy M13, because it has 512 GB internal memory.
Samsung Galaxy M13 counts with a much better performing CPU than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, although it has lesser RAM, they both have 8 cores. Vivo X Fold 3 Pro counts with a little better battery performance than Samsung Galaxy M13, because it has 5700mAh of battery capacity instead of 5000mAh. Vivo X Fold 3 Pro counts with a way better camera than Galaxy M13, and although they both have a same resolution camera, the vivo X Fold 3 Pro also has a bigger aperture.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.