Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.8 | 78.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Samsung |
| Android 14 | Android 10, 9.0 Pie, 8.1 Oreo |
| 2024-04-03 | 2019-02-05 |
| 6.30 x 5.62 x 0.19 inches | 6.16 x 2.93 x 0.35 inches |
| 7.73 ounces | 6.56 ounces |
| Black and White | Charcoal black and Ocean blue |
| -- | Plastic and Plastic |
| $ 1915.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 8 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2480 x 2200 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 414 pixels per inch | 409 pixels per inch |
| 4500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.5 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7904 chipset |
| processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor |
| 16 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 750 GPU | Mali-G71 MP2 GPU |
| 6.3 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 17.6 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 23.00mm focal length | 12.00mm focal length |
| 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor | 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.87 | 9.02 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5700mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 7.36 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy M20 has a score of 78.9, which is a little bit better than the vivo X Fold 3 Pro's 77.8 overall score. Although the Galaxy M20 is older and notably thicker than the vivo X Fold 3 Pro, it's construction is still somewhat lighter. These devices have Android OS (operating system), but Galaxy M20 has an older 10 version while vivo X Fold 3 Pro has Android 14.
The Galaxy M20 has an extremely better CPU than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, although it has lesser RAM, they both have the same number of cores. Vivo X Fold 3 Pro counts with a much more vibrant screen than Galaxy M20, because it has a way higher resolution of 2200 x 2480, a bigger display and a bit better quantity of pixels in each screen inch.
Vivo X Fold 3 Pro has a lot bigger storage for games and applications than Galaxy M20, because although it has no SD memory slot, it also counts with more internal storage capacity. The vivo X Fold 3 Pro takes greater pictures and videos than Samsung Galaxy M20, because it has a way better 7680x4320 video resolution, a much bigger back camera sensor capturing much better quality videos and photographs, a larger aperture to take better low-light captures and video and a back-facing camera with a lot better resolution.
The vivo X Fold 3 Pro has a bit better battery lifetime than Galaxy M20, because it has 5700mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.