Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.8 | 82.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Samsung |
| Android 14 | Android 9.0 Pie, 8.1 Oreo |
| 2024-04-03 | 2019-03-07 |
| 6.30 x 5.62 x 0.19 inches | 6.26 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.73 ounces | 6.14 ounces |
| Black and White | Black and Blue |
| -- | Plastic |
| $ 1915.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 8 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2480 x 2200 pixels | 2280 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 414 pixels per inch | 394 pixels per inch |
| 4500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.5 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7904 chipset |
| processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor |
| 16 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 750 GPU | Mali-G71 MP2 GPU |
| 6.3 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 17.6 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 13.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 23.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor | 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.87 | 9.13 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5700mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 7.36 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy M30 is a little bit better than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, with a general score of 82.4 against 77.8. Both of these phones have Android operating system, but the Samsung Galaxy M30 has a newer 9.0 Pie version and vivo X Fold 3 Pro has Android 14 version. Samsung Galaxy M30 is an a lot older and noticeably thicker phone than the vivo X Fold 3 Pro, but Samsung managed to build it incredibly lighter anyway.
The Galaxy M30 features a really superior performance than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, although it has a lower amount of RAM, they both have a Octa-Core processing unit. Vivo X Fold 3 Pro has a lot better display than Galaxy M30, because it has a larger screen, a bit greater pixel amount in each inch of screen and a much better 2200 x 2480 pixels resolution.
Vivo X Fold 3 Pro has a lot bigger storage capacity for applications and games than Samsung Galaxy M30, because although it has no slot for an SD memory card, it also counts with 512 GB internal memory capacity. Vivo X Fold 3 Pro shoots much clearer photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy M30, because it has a way more MP back camera, a way higher 7680x4320 video definition, a much bigger sensor shooting way better quality videos and pictures and a bigger aperture to capture better low-light photos and video.
The vivo X Fold 3 Pro counts with a little longer battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy M30, because it has a 5700mAh battery capacity instead of 5000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.