Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.8 | 85 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Samsung |
| Android 14 | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2024-04-03 | 2019-06-18 |
| 6.30 x 5.62 x 0.19 inches | 6.11 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.73 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| Black and White | Midnight blue and Seawater blue |
| -- | Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1915.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 8 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2480 x 2200 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 414 pixels per inch | 409 pixels per inch |
| 4500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.5 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 16 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 750 GPU | Adreno 612 GPU |
| 6.3 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 17.6 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 32.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 23.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.87 | 10.78 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5700mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 7.36 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy M40 has a general score of 85, which is a bit better than vivo X Fold 3 Pro's overall score of 77.8. Both devices in this comparison work with Android OS, but Galaxy M40 has the older 10 version while vivo X Fold 3 Pro has Android 14 version. Although Galaxy M40 is extremely older and a lot thicker than the vivo X Fold 3 Pro, it's body is still lighter.
The Samsung Galaxy M40 counts with a way better performance than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, although it has a lower amount of RAM, they both have 8 processing cores. Vivo X Fold 3 Pro has an incredibly better looking display than Samsung Galaxy M40, because it has a lot higher 2200 x 2480px resolution, a quite higher display pixel density and a bigger screen.
Vivo X Fold 3 Pro counts with a lot bigger storage to install games and applications than Galaxy M40, because although it has no slot for SD memory cards, it also counts with 512 GB internal storage capacity. The vivo X Fold 3 Pro takes better photographs and videos than Samsung Galaxy M40, and although they both have a same size camera aperture, the vivo X Fold 3 Pro also has a camera in the back with a much better 50 mega pixels resolution, a much better 7680x4320 video resolution and a lot larger camera sensor shooting lot higher quality videos and photographs.
The vivo X Fold 3 Pro features a much longer battery duration than Galaxy M40, because it has a 5700mAh battery size instead of 3500mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.