Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.8 | 90.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Samsung |
| Android 14 | -- |
| 2024-04-03 | 2020-08-21 |
| 6.30 x 5.62 x 0.19 inches | 6.36 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.73 ounces | 6.84 ounces |
| Black and White | Mystic bronze, Mystic gray, Mystic green and Mystic red |
| -- | Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1915.00 | $ 1000.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 8 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2480 x 2200 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 414 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| 4500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.5 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB (7 nm) chipset |
| processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor |
| 16 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 750 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 6.3 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 17.6 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 23.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor | 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.87 | 10.67 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5700mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 7.36 | 6.16 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy Note 20 is much better than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, with a 90.8 score against 77.8. The Samsung Galaxy Note 20 is a incredibly older and way thicker phone than the vivo X Fold 3 Pro, but Samsung managed to make it lighter anyway. The Samsung Galaxy Note 20 counts with a really superior hardware performance than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, although it has lesser RAM memory, they both have a Octa-Core processing unit.
The vivo X Fold 3 Pro counts with a much sharper display than Samsung Galaxy Note 20, because it has a lot better resolution of 2200 x 2480, a larger display and a quite better pixels density. The vivo X Fold 3 Pro takes greater photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy Note 20, and although they both have the same 7680x4320 video quality, the vivo X Fold 3 Pro also has better 30 fps video frame rate, a lot bigger camera sensor which gives a lot higher photo and video quality, a larger aperture for better low-light images and video and a way better 50 megapixels resolution camera.
The vivo X Fold 3 Pro counts with a much better storage for applications and games than Galaxy Note 20, because it has 512 GB internal memory capacity. The vivo X Fold 3 Pro counts with greater battery performance than Samsung Galaxy Note 20, because it has a 5700mAh battery capacity instead of 4300mAh.
The Samsung Galaxy Note 20 is not only the best phones between the ones we are comparing here, but it's also a bargain compared to the other phones.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.