Compare phones
Samsung Galaxy Note 3
Dual SIMN9002
| Global Score | |
| 77.8 | 81.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Samsung |
| Android 14 | Android 5.0, 4.4.4, 4.4, 4.3 |
| 2024-04-03 | 2013-09-04 |
| 6.30 x 5.62 x 0.19 inches | 5.95 x 3.12 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.73 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| Black and White | Black, Pink and White |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1915.00 | $ 265.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 8 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2480 x 2200 pixels | 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 414 pixels per inch | 386 pixels per inch |
| 4500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 10.5 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 800 MSM8974 chipset |
| processor | Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 16 GB RAM | 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 750 GPU | Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU |
| 6.3 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSD, microSDHC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot |
| 17.6 | 9.46 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 13.00 MP + 2.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| 23.00mm focal length | 31.00mm focal length |
| 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor | 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.87 | 9.68 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM | Micro SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 7.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5700mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3200mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| -- | 528 hours standby time 25 hours talk time |
| 7.36 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Note 3 has a global score of 81.2, which is slightly better than the vivo X Fold 3 Pro's general score of 77.8. Galaxy Note 3's construction is lighter than the vivo X Fold 3 Pro, but it's way thicker and was released many years before. These phones come with Android operating system, but the Galaxy Note 3 has 5.0 version while vivo X Fold 3 Pro has Android 14 version.
Vivo X Fold 3 Pro counts with a better screen than Galaxy Note 3, because it has a just a bit better pixel quantity per inch of display, a way better 2200 x 2480 resolution and a way larger screen. Samsung Galaxy Note 3 counts with a much faster CPU than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, because although it has a smaller amount of RAM and an inferior number of cores , it also counts with a graphics processing unit.
The vivo X Fold 3 Pro takes much clearer pictures and videos than Galaxy Note 3, because it has a way higher 7680x4320 video resolution, a much larger back-facing camera sensor capturing lot better quality videos and photographs, a way more megapixels camera and a way bigger aperture for better low-light captures and videos.
Vivo X Fold 3 Pro counts with a much greater memory for applications and games than Samsung Galaxy Note 3, because although it has no SD card slot, it also counts with 512 GB internal storage. Vivo X Fold 3 Pro features a superior battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy Note 3, because it has 5700mAh of battery capacity against 3200mAh.
Even being the best phone between the ones we are comparing here, the Galaxy Note 3 is also by far the cheapest one.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.