Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.8 | 89 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Samsung |
| Android 14 | -- |
| 2024-04-03 | 2019-08-23 |
| 6.30 x 5.62 x 0.19 inches | 5.94 x 2.83 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.73 ounces | 5.89 ounces |
| Black and White | Aura black, Aura glow and Aura white |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1915.00 | $ 950.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 8 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2480 x 2200 pixels | 2280 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 414 pixels per inch | 400 pixels per inch |
| 4500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.5 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 16 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 750 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 6.3 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 17.6 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 23.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.87 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5700mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3500mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 7.36 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Note10 has a score of 89, which is much better than the vivo X Fold 3 Pro's 77.8 global score. Even though the Samsung Galaxy Note10 is older and noticeably thicker than the vivo X Fold 3 Pro, it's design is still way lighter. The vivo X Fold 3 Pro has a much sharper display than Galaxy Note10, because it has a lot higher resolution of 2200 x 2480px, a quite greater number of pixels per screen inch and a bigger display.
Vivo X Fold 3 Pro has a lot bigger memory to store more apps and games than Samsung Galaxy Note10, because it has more internal storage capacity. The Galaxy Note10 counts with a lot better performance than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, although it has a smaller amount of RAM memory, they both have the same number of cores.
The vivo X Fold 3 Pro counts with a superior battery life than Galaxy Note10, because it has 5700mAh of battery capacity. The vivo X Fold 3 Pro captures way better videos and photos than Samsung Galaxy Note10, because although it has a smaller camera aperture which is worse for low light photography and video, it also counts with a lot higher video resolution, a much bigger back-facing camera sensor providing a lot higher image quality and a camera with a much better resolution.
The Galaxy Note10 is not only the best phones in our comparison, but it's also by far the cheapest one.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.