Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.8 | 86.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Samsung |
| Android 14 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2024-04-03 | 2020-01-21 |
| 6.30 x 5.62 x 0.19 inches | 6.44 x 3.00 x 0.34 inches |
| 7.73 ounces | 7.02 ounces |
| Black and White | Aura black, Aura glow and Aura red |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1915.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 8 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2480 x 2200 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 414 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| 4500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.5 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset | Samsung Exynos 9810 chipset |
| processor | Exynos M3 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2700 MHz) processor |
| 16 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 750 GPU | Mali-G72 MP18 GPU |
| 6.3 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 17.6 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 23.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.87 | 10.34 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5700mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 7.36 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy Note10 Lite has a global score of 86.2, which is better than the vivo X Fold 3 Pro's 77.8 general score. Even though Galaxy Note10 Lite is notably older and way thicker than the vivo X Fold 3 Pro, it's design is still just a little lighter. Both phones in this comparison review have Android OS (operating system), but Galaxy Note10 Lite has the older 11 version while vivo X Fold 3 Pro has Android 14 version.
The Galaxy Note10 Lite has a much better performing processing unit than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, although it has a lower amount of RAM, they both have a Octa-Core CPU. The vivo X Fold 3 Pro features an incredibly better display than Galaxy Note10 Lite, because it has a larger screen, a lot higher 2200 x 2480px resolution and a bit greater count of pixels per inch in the screen.
Vivo X Fold 3 Pro shoots a lot better photographs and videos than Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite, and although they both have a F1.7 aperture, the vivo X Fold 3 Pro also has a much larger back camera sensor, a camera in the back with a lot higher resolution and a lot better video definition. The vivo X Fold 3 Pro features a quite bigger storage capacity for apps and games than Galaxy Note10 Lite, because although it has no SD card slot, it also counts with 512 GB internal storage.
The vivo X Fold 3 Pro features greater battery duration than Galaxy Note10 Lite, because it has 5700mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.