Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.8 | 77.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Samsung |
| Android 14 | Android 4.4.2 |
| 2024-04-03 | 2013-09-25 |
| 6.30 x 5.62 x 0.19 inches | 5.95 x 3.12 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.73 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| Black and White | Black, Pink and White |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1915.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 8 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2480 x 2200 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 414 pixels per inch | 386 pixels per inch |
| 4500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.5 | 7.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 800 MSM8974 chipset |
| processor | Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 16 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Adreno 750 GPU | Adreno 330 GPU |
| 6.3 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDHC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot |
| 17.6 | 9.46 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 13.00 MP + 2.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| 23.00mm focal length | 31.00mm focal length |
| 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor | 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.87 | 9.57 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Micro SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5700mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3200mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 7.36 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Vivo X Fold 3 Pro has a general score of 77.8, which is slightly better than the Galaxy Note3's 77.7 overall score. Both of these phones work with Android OS, but vivo X Fold 3 Pro has the previous 14 version and Galaxy Note3 has Android 4.4.2 version. The vivo X Fold 3 Pro is a notably newer and thinner phone than Galaxy Note3, although it is also way heavier.
Vivo X Fold 3 Pro features a way better screen than Galaxy Note3, because it has a really bigger screen, a little greater amount of pixels in each inch in the screen and a lot better resolution of 2200 x 2480px. The Galaxy Note3 has a very superior hardware performance than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, although it has a smaller amount of RAM memory and a lower number of cores.
The vivo X Fold 3 Pro takes way better pictures and videos than Samsung Galaxy Note3, because it has a much bigger aperture, a lot more mega pixels back camera, a much bigger sensor which offers a way better image and video quality and a way better 7680x4320 video definition. The vivo X Fold 3 Pro counts with a very superior storage to store more apps and games than Galaxy Note3, because although it has no SD card slot, it also counts with more internal storage capacity.
Vivo X Fold 3 Pro counts with a much longer battery life than Galaxy Note3, because it has a 78% larger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.