Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.8 | 80.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Samsung |
| Android 14 | -- |
| 2024-04-03 | 2015-08-21 |
| 6.30 x 5.62 x 0.19 inches | 6.03 x 3.00 x 0.30 inches |
| 7.73 ounces | 6.03 ounces |
| Black and White | Black sapphire, Gold platinum, Silver titan and White pearl |
| -- | Glass and Metal |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1915.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 8 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2480 x 2200 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 414 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| 4500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.5 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7420 chipset |
| processor | ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2100 MHz) processor |
| 16 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 750 GPU | Mali-T760 MP8 GPU |
| 6.3 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 17.6 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 23.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video | 2560 x 1440 (60 fps) (Quad HD / 2K) slow motion video |
| 12.87 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.3 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5700mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 7.36 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy Note5 has a score of 80.2, which is a bit better than vivo X Fold 3 Pro's general score of 77.8. Although Galaxy Note5 is noticeably older and way thicker than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, it's design is still way lighter. The vivo X Fold 3 Pro counts with a much more vibrant screen than Galaxy Note5, because although it has a little bit lower quantity of pixels per inch of display, it also counts with a lot larger display and a higher resolution of 2200 x 2480px.
Galaxy Note5 has a lot better performance than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, although it has 12 GB lesser RAM, they both have 8 cores. Vivo X Fold 3 Pro counts with a much better camera than Samsung Galaxy Note5, because it has a way better 50 megapixels resolution back facing camera, a bigger aperture to capture better captures in low-light environments, a way larger back-facing camera sensor which gives a lot better photo and video quality and a way better video resolution.
Vivo X Fold 3 Pro features a very superior storage capacity to store more games and applications than Galaxy Note5, because it has 512 GB internal memory. The vivo X Fold 3 Pro counts with a much longer battery lifetime than Galaxy Note5, because it has a 90% more battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.