Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.8 | 79.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Samsung |
| Android 14 | -- |
| 2024-04-03 | 2016-08-02 |
| 6.30 x 5.62 x 0.19 inches | 6.04 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.73 ounces | 5.96 ounces |
| Black and White | Black onyx, Blue coral, Gold platinum and Silver titanium |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1915.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 8 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2480 x 2200 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 414 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| 4500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.5 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| processor | Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 16 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 750 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 6.3 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 17.6 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 23.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor | 0.4 inches (1/2.5") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.87 | 9.57 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5700mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3500mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 7.36 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy Note7 has a global score of 79.5, which is slightly better than vivo X Fold 3 Pro's 77.8 score. Galaxy Note7's design is incredibly lighter than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, but it's a lot thicker and was released many years before. Vivo X Fold 3 Pro counts with a lot better looking display than Galaxy Note7, because although it has a little inferior number of pixels per screen inch, it also counts with a lot bigger display and a higher 2200 x 2480 pixels resolution.
Vivo X Fold 3 Pro features a much greater memory capacity for games and applications than Galaxy Note7, because although it has no external memory card slot, it also counts with 448 GB more internal memory. Galaxy Note7 features an extremely better processor than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, although it has less CPU cores and lesser RAM.
The vivo X Fold 3 Pro counts with a much better battery performance than Galaxy Note7, because it has a 63 percent greater battery size. The vivo X Fold 3 Pro takes a lot better photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy Note7, and although they both have a F1.7 aperture, the vivo X Fold 3 Pro also has a camera with much more mega pixels, a lot larger back-facing camera sensor shooting much better quality pictures and videos and a way better video definition.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.