Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.8 | 76.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Samsung |
| Android 14 | Android 9.0 Pie, 7.1 Nougat |
| 2024-04-03 | 2018-01-09 |
| 6.30 x 5.62 x 0.19 inches | 5.97 x 2.95 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.73 ounces | 6.00 ounces |
| Black and White | 16 777 216 |
| -- | Metal |
| $ 1915.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 8 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 2480 x 2200 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| AMOLED | TFT |
| 414 pixels per inch | 401 pixels per inch |
| 4500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.5 | 7.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7870 chipset |
| processor | ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor |
| 16 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 750 GPU | Mali-T830 MP1 GPU |
| 6.3 | 8.82 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 17.6 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 13.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 23.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor | 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.87 | 9.13 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5700mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3300mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 7.36 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 4.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The vivo X Fold 3 Pro is a little bit better than Galaxy On7 Prime, getting a global score of 77.8 against 76.9. Both phones in this review include Android operating system, but the vivo X Fold 3 Pro has older 14 version and Galaxy On7 Prime has Android 9.0 Pie version. Even though vivo X Fold 3 Pro is notably heavier than the Galaxy On7 Prime, it's much thinner and notably newer.
Vivo X Fold 3 Pro features a way better looking display than Galaxy On7 Prime, because it has a way higher 2200 x 2480 resolution, a just a bit better pixels number in each screen inch and a way bigger display. The vivo X Fold 3 Pro counts with a lot bigger storage capacity for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy On7 Prime, because although it has no external memory slot, it also counts with 448 GB more internal storage capacity.
Samsung Galaxy On7 Prime counts with a much better performing CPU than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, although it has a smaller amount of RAM memory, they both have the same number of cores. Vivo X Fold 3 Pro features a way better battery lifetime than Galaxy On7 Prime, because it has a 5700mAh battery capacity instead of 3300mAh.
The vivo X Fold 3 Pro shoots greater videos and photos than Galaxy On7 Prime, because it has a lot better video definition, a camera in the back with way more mega pixels, a way bigger camera sensor which gives a lot higher image and video quality and a bigger aperture.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.