Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.8 | 88.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Samsung |
| Android 14 | Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2024-04-03 | 2019-03-08 |
| 6.30 x 5.62 x 0.19 inches | 5.90 x 2.77 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.73 ounces | 5.54 ounces |
| Black and White | Flamingo pink, Prism black, Prism blue, Prism green and Prism white |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1915.00 | $ 281.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 8 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 2480 x 2200 pixels | 3040 x 1440 pixels |
| AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 414 pixels per inch | 551 pixels per inch |
| 4500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.5 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 16 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 750 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 6.3 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 17.6 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 23.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.87 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5700mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3400mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 7.36 | 5.36 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy S10 has a global score of 88.3, which is much better than vivo X Fold 3 Pro's score of 77.8. Even though Samsung Galaxy S10 is notably older and much thicker than the vivo X Fold 3 Pro, it's body is still a lot lighter. Both phones we are comparing here have Android operating system, but Samsung Galaxy S10 has the older 11 version while vivo X Fold 3 Pro has Android 14.
The vivo X Fold 3 Pro features a more vivid display than Samsung Galaxy S10, because although it has a little bit less pixels per inch of screen, it also counts with a slightly better 2200 x 2480 resolution and a lot larger screen. The vivo X Fold 3 Pro features a much bigger storage for applications and games than Samsung Galaxy S10, because although it has no external SD slot, it also counts with more internal memory capacity.
The Galaxy S10 features a lot better processing power than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, although it has a lower amount of RAM, they both have the same number of cores. Vivo X Fold 3 Pro features a way better camera than Galaxy S10, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not good for taking images or video in low-light situations, it also counts with a much larger sensor providing a lot better image quality, a back-facing camera with a way higher resolution and a lot higher 7680x4320 video quality.
The vivo X Fold 3 Pro counts with a superior battery duration than Galaxy S10, because it has a 5700mAh battery size.
Despite of being the best phone in this comparison, Samsung Galaxy S10 is also very cheap compared to the other ones.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.