Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.8 | 93.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Samsung |
| Android 14 | Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2024-04-03 | 2019-05-16 |
| 6.30 x 5.62 x 0.19 inches | 6.40 x 3.04 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.73 ounces | 6.98 ounces |
| Black and White | Crown silver, Majestic black and Royal gold |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1915.00 | $ 342.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 8 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2480 x 2200 pixels | 3040 x 1440 pixels |
| AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 414 pixels per inch | 502 pixels per inch |
| 4500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.5 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 16 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 750 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 6.3 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 17.6 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 23.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.87 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5700mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 7.36 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S10 5G has an overall score of 93.6, which is much better than the vivo X Fold 3 Pro's 77.8 score. Both of these phones come with Android OS (Operating System), but the Galaxy S10 5G has older 11 version and vivo X Fold 3 Pro has Android 14 version. Even though the Galaxy S10 5G is incredibly older and way thicker than the vivo X Fold 3 Pro, it's design is still just a little bit lighter.
The vivo X Fold 3 Pro has an incredibly better looking display than Samsung Galaxy S10 5G, because although it has a little bit lower quantity of pixels per inch in the screen, it also counts with a slightly better resolution of 2200 x 2480px and a bigger screen. Vivo X Fold 3 Pro features a much bigger memory capacity for games and applications than Galaxy S10 5G, because it has more internal memory.
Samsung Galaxy S10 5G features a much faster processing unit than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, although it has a smaller amount of RAM memory, they both have the same number of cores. The vivo X Fold 3 Pro has greater battery performance than Samsung Galaxy S10 5G, because it has a 5700mAh battery size instead of 4500mAh.
The vivo X Fold 3 Pro shoots much better photographs and videos than Samsung Galaxy S10 5G, because although it has a smaller diafragm aperture which is not favorable for capturing pictures or video in low-light environments, it also counts with a lot better video quality, a much larger back-facing camera sensor taking more light and vivid colors and a way higher resolution camera in the back.
Even being the best phone of the ones we are comparing, the Galaxy S10 5G is also very cheap compared to the other devices, which makes this phone a great choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.