Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.8 | 94.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Samsung |
| Android 14 | Android 13, 12, 11, 10 |
| 2024-04-03 | 2020-03-06 |
| 6.30 x 5.62 x 0.19 inches | 5.97 x 2.72 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.73 ounces | 5.78 ounces |
| Black and White | Cloud blue, Cloud pink, Cosmic grey and Cosmic white |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1915.00 | $ 1000.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 8 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 2480 x 2200 pixels | 3200 x 1440 pixels |
| AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 414 pixels per inch | 566 pixels per inch |
| 4500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.5 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 (7 nm) chipset |
| processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 16 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 750 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 6.3 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 17.6 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 23.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.87 | 10.78 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5700mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 7.36 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S20 has an overall score of 94.8, which is much better than vivo X Fold 3 Pro's general score of 77.8. These phones have Android OS, but Galaxy S20 has older 13 version while vivo X Fold 3 Pro has Android 14. The Galaxy S20 body is extremely lighter than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, although it is much thicker and was released 4 years before.
Vivo X Fold 3 Pro has a sharper display than Galaxy S20, because although it has a way lower quantity of pixels per screen inch, it also counts with a bigger screen and a quite better resolution of 2200 x 2480. Vivo X Fold 3 Pro counts with a quite bigger memory to install games and applications than Galaxy S20, because although it has no slot for an SD memory card, it also counts with 512 GB internal memory capacity.
Galaxy S20 features a much more powerful CPU than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, although it has a smaller amount of RAM, they both have a Octa-Core CPU. Vivo X Fold 3 Pro counts with a much better battery duration than Galaxy S20, because it has a 43 percent bigger battery capacity. Vivo X Fold 3 Pro takes much better videos and photos than Samsung Galaxy S20, and although they both have the same 7680x4320 video resolution, the vivo X Fold 3 Pro also has a lot bigger back camera sensor, a larger camera aperture for better images in low-light environments, a back-facing camera with much more mega-pixels and higher video frame rate.
Galaxy S20 is not only the best devices between the ones we are comparing here, but it's also a bargain compared to the other devices.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.