Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.8 | 90.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Samsung |
| Android 14 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2024-04-03 | 2020-10-02 |
| 6.30 x 5.62 x 0.19 inches | 6.29 x 2.93 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.73 ounces | 6.70 ounces |
| Black and White | Cloud lavender, Cloud mint, Cloud navy, Cloud orange, Cloud red and Cloud white |
| -- | Aluminum and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1915.00 | $ 509.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 8 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2480 x 2200 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 414 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| 4500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.5 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 16 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 750 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 6.3 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 17.6 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 23.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor | 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.87 | 10.56 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5700mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 7.36 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S20 FE has a global score of 90.8, which is much better than vivo X Fold 3 Pro's 77.8 global score. Both of these phones work with Android OS (operating system), but Galaxy S20 FE has the previous 11 version while vivo X Fold 3 Pro has Android 14 version. Galaxy S20 FE is a much older and way thicker phone than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, but Samsung was able to build it lighter anyway.
Vivo X Fold 3 Pro features an incredibly better screen than Samsung Galaxy S20 FE, because it has a just a little more pixels per inch in the display, a lot higher resolution of 2200 x 2480px and a larger display. Vivo X Fold 3 Pro features a better memory to store more apps and games than Galaxy S20 FE, because although it has no slot for external memory cards, it also counts with 384 GB more internal memory capacity.
The Samsung Galaxy S20 FE has a much faster processing unit than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, although it has 10 GB lesser RAM, they both have a Octa-Core processor. Vivo X Fold 3 Pro has longer battery performance than Galaxy S20 FE, because it has a 27 percent bigger battery capacity. The vivo X Fold 3 Pro shoots much better pictures and videos than Galaxy S20 FE, because it has a lot higher 7680x4320 video quality, a much larger camera sensor shooting way better quality photos, a way better resolution back camera and a bigger aperture.
Even being the best phone between the ones we are comparing, the Samsung Galaxy S20 FE is also very cheap compared to the other phones, making this phone a great choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.