Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.8 | 98 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Samsung |
| Android 14 | Android 13, 12, 11, 10 |
| 2024-04-03 | 2020-03-06 |
| 6.30 x 5.62 x 0.19 inches | 6.57 x 2.99 x 0.35 inches |
| 7.73 ounces | 7.83 ounces |
| Black and White | Cosmic black and Cosmic grey |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1915.00 | $ 1400.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 8 inches | 6.9 inches |
| 2480 x 2200 pixels | 3200 x 1440 pixels |
| AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 414 pixels per inch | 509 pixels per inch |
| 4500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.5 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 (7 nm) chipset |
| processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 16 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 750 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 6.3 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 17.6 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 40.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 23.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.87 | 13.42 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5700mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 7.36 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G is way better than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, getting a general score of 98 against 77.8. Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G is a much older, a little heavier and thicker cellphone than the vivo X Fold 3 Pro. Both of these phones include Android OS (Operating System), but Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has an older 13 version and vivo X Fold 3 Pro has Android 14 version.
The vivo X Fold 3 Pro counts with a much sharper screen than Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G, because although it has a just a little lower screen pixel density, it also counts with a larger display and a little higher resolution of 2200 x 2480. Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G features a very superior processing power than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, although it has a lower amount of RAM, they both have 8 CPU cores.
Vivo X Fold 3 Pro features a greater storage for applications and games than Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G, because although it has no external memory slot, it also counts with more internal memory capacity. Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G takes clearer photos and videos than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, because although it has a smaller diafragm aperture, a way smaller camera sensor capturing less light and washed colors and lower video frame rate, and they both have the same video quality, the Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G also counts with a back-facing camera with a much higher 108 MP resolution.
The vivo X Fold 3 Pro counts with a bit better battery life than Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G, because it has 5700mAh of battery capacity against 5000mAh.
Despite of being the best phone between the ones we are comparing, the Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G is also by far the cheapest one.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.