Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.8 | 89.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Samsung |
| Android 14 | Android 11 |
| 2024-04-03 | 2022-01-11 |
| 6.30 x 5.62 x 0.19 inches | 6.13 x 2.93 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.73 ounces | 6.00 ounces |
| Black and White | -- |
| -- | Metal and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1915.00 | $ 700.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 8 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2480 x 2200 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 414 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| 4500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.5 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 SM8350 (5 nm) chipset |
| processor | Kryo 680 Prime, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 16 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 750 GPU | Adreno 660 GPU |
| 6.3 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 17.6 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 23.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor | -- |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.87 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5700mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 7.36 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy S21 FE has an overall score of 89.1, which is much better than vivo X Fold 3 Pro's overall score of 77.8. Both of these devices work with Android OS (Operating System), but Samsung Galaxy S21 FE has the previous 11 version while vivo X Fold 3 Pro has Android 14. Although Samsung Galaxy S21 FE is a lot older and incredibly thicker than the vivo X Fold 3 Pro, it's design is still a lot lighter.
The Samsung Galaxy S21 FE counts with a way better processing power than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, although it has a lower amount of RAM, they both have a Octa-Core CPU. The vivo X Fold 3 Pro has an incredibly better looking display than Galaxy S21 FE, because it has a lot higher 2200 x 2480 resolution, a just a little more pixels per inch in the screen and a bigger display.
Vivo X Fold 3 Pro counts with a much greater memory to install applications and games than Galaxy S21 FE, because it has 512 GB internal storage capacity. Vivo X Fold 3 Pro features a lot better camera than Galaxy S21 FE, because it has a larger aperture to capture better photos and video in low light environments, a lot higher video definition and a camera with way more MP.
The vivo X Fold 3 Pro features greater battery duration than Galaxy S21 FE, because it has a 27 percent bigger battery size.
Even being the best phone between the ones we are comparing here, the Galaxy S21 FE is also very cheap compared to the other devices.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.