Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.8 | 93.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Samsung |
| Android 14 | Android 13, 12 |
| 2024-04-03 | 2022-02-25 |
| 6.30 x 5.62 x 0.19 inches | 5.75 x 2.78 x 0.30 inches |
| 7.73 ounces | 5.89 ounces |
| Black and White | Green, Phantom Black, Pink Gold and White |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1915.00 | $ 799.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 8 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 2480 x 2200 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 414 pixels per inch | 422 pixels per inch |
| 4500 cd/m2 brightness | 1500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | Multi-touch |
| 10.5 | 9.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 SM8450 (4 nm) chipset |
| processor | Quad-Core 3000 MHz + Quad-Core 1800 MHz processor |
| 16 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 750 GPU | Adreno 730 GPU |
| 6.3 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 17.6 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 23.00mm focal length | 23.00mm focal length |
| 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor | 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.87 | 12.43 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5700mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3700mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 7.36 | 5.68 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy S22 has a global score of 93.4, which is much better than vivo X Fold 3 Pro's score of 77.8. These phones use Android OS, but Galaxy S22 has 13 version while vivo X Fold 3 Pro has Android 14 version. The Galaxy S22 body is notably lighter than the vivo X Fold 3 Pro, although it is thicker and was released many years before.
Vivo X Fold 3 Pro counts with a slightly better screen than Galaxy S22, because although it has a little bit inferior pixel count per inch of screen, it also counts with a way higher 2200 x 2480 resolution, a much brighter display and a really larger display. Vivo X Fold 3 Pro has a much bigger storage for apps and games than Galaxy S22, because it has more internal storage capacity.
Galaxy S22 has a lot better processing power than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, although it has a smaller amount of RAM, they both have the same number of cores. Vivo X Fold 3 Pro captures clearer photos and videos than Galaxy S22, and although they both have the same video resolution and the same resolution back facing camera, the vivo X Fold 3 Pro also has a larger aperture, a bigger camera sensor capturing better quality photographs and videos and better video frame rate.
The vivo X Fold 3 Pro has a way better battery life than Galaxy S22, because it has a 54 percent more battery capacity.
Galaxy S22 not only is the best phones in our comparison, but it's also a lot cheaper.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.