Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.8 | 82.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Samsung |
| Android 14 | Android 14 |
| 2024-04-03 | -- |
| 6.30 x 5.62 x 0.19 inches | -- |
| 7.73 ounces | -- |
| Black and White | -- |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus 2) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1915.00 | $ 800.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 8 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 2480 x 2200 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 414 pixels per inch | 416 pixels per inch |
| 4500 cd/m2 brightness | 2600 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.5 | 9.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 4 chipset |
| processor | processor |
| 16 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 750 GPU | Yes GPU |
| 6.3 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 17.6 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 23.00mm focal length | 24.00mm focal length |
| 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor | 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.87 | 12.54 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5700mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 7.36 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy S25 has a general score of 82.6, which is just a bit better than vivo X Fold 3 Pro's score of 77.8. The Samsung Galaxy S25 construction is incredibly lighter and notably thinner than the vivo X Fold 3 Pro. Both of these devices include the same Android 14 OS, so you shouldn't perceive any difference in that aspect.
Vivo X Fold 3 Pro counts with just a little better processing power than Galaxy S25, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the vivo X Fold 3 Pro also has more RAM. Vivo X Fold 3 Pro features a little more vivid screen than Galaxy S25, because although it has a little lower amount of pixels per display inch, it also counts with a really brighter screen, a larger screen and a lot better resolution of 2200 x 2480.
The vivo X Fold 3 Pro shoots slightly better videos and photos than Galaxy S25, and although they both have the same resolution back camera, the same video quality and the same 30 frames per second video frame rates, the vivo X Fold 3 Pro also has a larger camera sensor capturing better quality videos and pictures and a larger aperture to capture better photography and video in low light situations.
The vivo X Fold 3 Pro counts with a way bigger memory for games and applications than Galaxy S25, because it has more internal memory. The vivo X Fold 3 Pro counts with a really longer battery performance than Samsung Galaxy S25, because it has a 43% more battery capacity.
The Samsung Galaxy S25 is not only the best phones between the ones we are comparing, but it's also a bargain compared to the other phones.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.