Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.8 | 90.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Samsung |
| Android 14 | Android 14 |
| 2024-04-03 | -- |
| 6.30 x 5.62 x 0.19 inches | -- |
| 7.73 ounces | -- |
| Black and White | -- |
| -- | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) and Titanium |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1915.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 8 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2480 x 2200 pixels | 3088 x 1440 pixels |
| AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 414 pixels per inch | 501 pixels per inch |
| 4500 cd/m2 brightness | 2600 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.5 | 10.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 4 chipset |
| processor | processor |
| 16 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 750 GPU | Yes GPU |
| 6.3 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 17.6 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 200.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 23.00mm focal length | 24.00mm focal length |
| 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor | 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.87 | 14.74 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5700mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 7.36 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S25 Ultra is better than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, having a general score of 90.7 against 77.8. Both devices in our current comparison work with the same Android 14 OS. The Galaxy S25 Ultra is a a lot lighter and much thinner device than the vivo X Fold 3 Pro. Vivo X Fold 3 Pro features a little faster processor than Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the vivo X Fold 3 Pro also has 4 GB more RAM.
The vivo X Fold 3 Pro features a little bit better display than Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra, because although it has a little less pixels per inch of screen, it also counts with a bigger screen, a slightly better 2200 x 2480px resolution and a much brighter screen. Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra shoots much better pictures and videos than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, and although they both have the same aperture, the same video frame rates, the same video definition and the same sensor size, the Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra also has a lot better resolution camera.
The vivo X Fold 3 Pro has a superior memory for apps and games than Galaxy S25 Ultra, because it has 256 GB more internal memory. The vivo X Fold 3 Pro counts with a little better battery performance than Galaxy S25 Ultra, because it has a 14% bigger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.