Compare phones
Samsung Galaxy S5
32 GBSM-G901F
| Global Score | |
| 77.8 | 80.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Samsung |
| Android 14 | Android 4.4.2 |
| 2024-04-03 | 2014-06-23 |
| 6.30 x 5.62 x 0.19 inches | 5.59 x 2.85 x 0.32 inches |
| 7.73 ounces | 5.11 ounces |
| Black and White | Black, Blue, Gold, Red and White |
| -- | Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1915.00 | $ 399.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 8 inches | 5.1 inches |
| 2480 x 2200 pixels | 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 414 pixels per inch | 576 pixels per inch |
| 4500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 10.5 | 9.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 805 chipset |
| processor | Krait 450 (Quad-Core 2500 MHz) processor |
| 16 GB RAM | 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 750 GPU | Adreno 420 (500 MHz) GPU |
| 6.3 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 17.6 | 8.12 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 2.10 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| 23.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.87 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM |
| Nano SIM | SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5700mAh Li - Ion Battery | 2800mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 7.36 | 4.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy S5 is just a bit better than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, with a global score of 80.8 against 77.8. The Samsung Galaxy S5 design is a lot lighter than the vivo X Fold 3 Pro, but it is much thicker and was released 10 years before. Both of these devices work with Android operating system, but Samsung Galaxy S5 has 4.4.2 version while vivo X Fold 3 Pro has Android 14 version, providing a lot of extra features and enhanced performance.
The vivo X Fold 3 Pro counts with a bit more vivid display than Galaxy S5, because although it has a much lower pixels number per screen inch, it also counts with a lot bigger screen and a much higher 2200 x 2480 resolution. Vivo X Fold 3 Pro counts with much more memory capacity for apps and games than Galaxy S5, because although it has no external SD slot, it also counts with more internal memory capacity.
The Galaxy S5 has a much better processing power than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, because although it has a lower amount of RAM and 4 less CPU cores , it also counts with a graphics processing unit. The vivo X Fold 3 Pro has a lot better camera than Galaxy S5, because it has a way better 7680x4320 video resolution, a lot bigger diafragm aperture for better captures and video in low light situations, a lot larger sensor capturing more light and vivid colors and a lot more mega-pixels camera in the back.
Vivo X Fold 3 Pro counts with a way better battery duration than Galaxy S5, because it has a 5700mAh battery size instead of 2800mAh.
Galaxy S5 not only is the best phones of the ones we compare here, but it's also by far the cheapest one.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.