Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.8 | 77.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Samsung |
| Android 14 | Android 4.4.2 |
| 2024-04-03 | 2014-06-23 |
| 6.30 x 5.62 x 0.19 inches | 5.67 x 2.91 x 0.35 inches |
| 7.73 ounces | 5.57 ounces |
| Black and White | Blue and Red |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1915.00 | $ 299.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 8 inches | 5.1 inches |
| 2480 x 2200 pixels | 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 414 pixels per inch | 432 pixels per inch |
| 4500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 10.5 | 9.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 801 MSM8974-AC chipset |
| processor | Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2500 MHz) processor |
| 16 GB RAM | 2 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 750 GPU | Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU |
| 6.3 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 16 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 17.6 | 6.72 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 2.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| 23.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.87 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM |
| Nano SIM | SIM |
| 10.6 | 7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5700mAh Li - Ion Battery | 2800mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| -- | 390 hours standby time 21 hours talk time |
| 7.36 | 4.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 4.0, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The vivo X Fold 3 Pro has a global score of 77.8, which is slightly better than the Galaxy S5 Sport's global score of 77.8. Both of these phones work with Android operating system, but the vivo X Fold 3 Pro has 14 version while Galaxy S5 Sport has Android 4.4.2. Vivo X Fold 3 Pro's design is newer and thinner than Galaxy S5 Sport's, but it is also much heavier.
The vivo X Fold 3 Pro counts with a sharper display than Samsung Galaxy S5 Sport, because although it has a little inferior pixels count per display inch, it also counts with a much larger screen and a lot higher resolution of 2200 x 2480px. Samsung Galaxy S5 Sport has a much more powerful processing unit than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, because although it has a smaller amount of RAM and an inferior number of cores , it also counts with a graphics co-processor.
The vivo X Fold 3 Pro features a lot bigger storage for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy S5 Sport, because although it has no slot for an SD memory card, it also counts with 512 GB internal storage capacity. Vivo X Fold 3 Pro counts with a very superior battery life than Galaxy S5 Sport, because it has a 5700mAh battery capacity.
The vivo X Fold 3 Pro shoots much clearer photographs and videos than Samsung Galaxy S5 Sport, because it has a lot better 7680x4320 video definition, a lot bigger camera aperture to capture better low-light captures and video, a way more megapixels camera in the back and a way bigger sensor taking more light and vivid colors.
Although vivo X Fold 3 Pro is a better device, it costs a lot more money than the Samsung Galaxy S5 Sport, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as the Samsung Galaxy S5 Sport. If you are trying to save a few dollars, you can buy Samsung Galaxy S5 Sport, and give up a few specs and features, but you'll get the most with your budget.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.