Compare phones
Samsung Galaxy S6
32 GBSM-G920F
| Global Score | |
| 77.8 | 83.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Samsung |
| Android 14 | Android 5.0 |
| 2024-04-03 | 2015-04-11 |
| 6.30 x 5.62 x 0.19 inches | 5.65 x 2.78 x 0.27 inches |
| 7.73 ounces | 4.87 ounces |
| Black and White | Black, Blue, Gold and White |
| -- | Aluminium and Glass |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1915.00 | $ 260.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 8 inches | 5.1 inches |
| 2480 x 2200 pixels | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 414 pixels per inch | 576 pixels per inch |
| 4500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 10.5 | 9.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset | Exynos 7 Octa 7420 chipset |
| processor | 64-bit ARM Cortex-A57 (Quad-Core 2100 MHz + Quad-Core 1500 MHz) processor |
| 16 GB RAM | 3 GB (1600 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 750 GPU | Mali-T760 MP8 (650 MHz) GPU |
| 6.3 | 10.08 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 17.6 | 5.8 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 23.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.87 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5700mAh Li - Ion Battery | 2550mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 7.36 | 4.56 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 4.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S6 has a score of 83.5, which is a bit better than vivo X Fold 3 Pro's 77.8 score. Both devices in this review have Android OS (Operating System), but the Galaxy S6 has older 5.0 version and vivo X Fold 3 Pro has Android 14. Even though the Galaxy S6 is incredibly older and extremely thicker than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, it's construction is still much lighter.
Samsung Galaxy S6 counts with a lot better hardware performance than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, because although it has a lower amount of RAM, and they both have the same number of cores, the Samsung Galaxy S6 also counts with a 64-bits processor and a graphics co-processor. The vivo X Fold 3 Pro has a bit sharper screen than Samsung Galaxy S6, because although it has way less pixels per inch in the screen, it also counts with a better resolution of 2200 x 2480px and a really larger display.
The vivo X Fold 3 Pro counts with much more storage for games and applications than Galaxy S6, because it has 512 GB internal memory. The vivo X Fold 3 Pro takes much clearer pictures and videos than Galaxy S6, because it has a much better 7680x4320 video quality, a larger aperture, a back camera with a much better 50 mega-pixels resolution and a lot bigger sensor.
The vivo X Fold 3 Pro counts with a way better battery life than Galaxy S6, because it has 5700mAh of battery capacity instead of 2550mAh.
The Galaxy S6 is not only the best phones of the ones we compare here, but it's also a bargain compared to the other ones, which makes it a no doubt choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.