Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.8 | 80.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Samsung |
| Android 14 | Android 5.0 |
| 2024-04-03 | -- |
| 6.30 x 5.62 x 0.19 inches | 5.78 x 2.90 x 0.35 inches |
| 7.73 ounces | -- |
| Black and White | -- |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1915.00 | $ 245.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 8 inches | 5.1 inches |
| 2480 x 2200 pixels | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 414 pixels per inch | 576 pixels per inch |
| 4500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 10.5 | 9.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset | Exynos 7 Octa 7420 chipset |
| processor | 64-bit ARM Cortex-A57 (Quad-Core 2100 MHz + Quad-Core 1500 MHz) processor |
| 16 GB RAM | 3 GB (1600 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 750 GPU | Mali-T760 MP8 (650 MHz) GPU |
| 6.3 | 10.08 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSD external memory slot |
| 17.6 | 5.8 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 23.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (4K) video resolution |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.87 | 8.47 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5700mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 7.36 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 4.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S6 Active is just a bit better than the vivo X Fold 3 Pro, with a general score of 80.9 against 77.8. Both phones in this review include Android OS, but Galaxy S6 Active has an older 5.0 version and vivo X Fold 3 Pro has Android 14. Galaxy S6 Active is a much thicker but notably lighter phone than the vivo X Fold 3 Pro.
The Galaxy S6 Active features a much greater performance than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, because although it has 13 GB less RAM memory, and they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy S6 Active also counts with a 64 bits CPU and an extra graphics processor. Vivo X Fold 3 Pro features a little sharper display than Galaxy S6 Active, because although it has a much lower amount of pixels in each inch of display, it also counts with a higher 2200 x 2480 resolution and a lot bigger display.
Vivo X Fold 3 Pro counts with a lot bigger memory capacity to store more apps and games than Samsung Galaxy S6 Active, because although it has no SD card slot, it also counts with 512 GB internal storage. The vivo X Fold 3 Pro features a very superior battery performance than Galaxy S6 Active, because it has a 63 percent bigger battery size.
The vivo X Fold 3 Pro counts with a greater camera than Samsung Galaxy S6 Active, because it has a way better 50 mega-pixels resolution back-facing camera, a way better video resolution, a lot larger sensor taking lot better quality photos and videos and a bigger diafragm aperture for better low-light photography and videos.
The Galaxy S6 Active is not only the best phones in our current comparison, but it's also a bargain compared to others, making it a no doubt choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.