Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.8 | 78.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Samsung |
| Android 14 | Android 8.0 Oreo, 7.0 Nougat, 6.0 Marshmallow |
| 2024-04-03 | 2016-03-11 |
| 6.30 x 5.62 x 0.19 inches | 5.94 x 2.86 x 0.30 inches |
| 7.73 ounces | 5.54 ounces |
| Black and White | Black, Black pearl, Coral blue, Gold, Pink gold, Silver and White |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 4) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1915.00 | $ 336.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 8 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 2480 x 2200 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 414 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| 4500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.5 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| processor | Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 16 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 750 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 6.3 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 200 GB) external memory slot |
| 17.6 | 8.56 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 23.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor | 0.4 inches (1/2.5") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.87 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5700mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3600mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 7.36 | 5.6 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy S7 edge has an overall score of 78.1, which is a little bit better than vivo X Fold 3 Pro's score of 77.8. Both of these phones work with Android OS (operating system), but the Samsung Galaxy S7 edge has the newer 8.0 Oreo version while vivo X Fold 3 Pro has Android 14, offering a couple additional features. Even though the Samsung Galaxy S7 edge is notably older and noticeably thicker than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, it's construction is still much lighter.
Galaxy S7 edge features a very superior performance than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, although it has a lower number of cores (but faster) and 12 GB lesser RAM. Vivo X Fold 3 Pro features a much sharper screen than Samsung Galaxy S7 edge, because although it has a bit less pixels per screen inch, it also counts with a better resolution of 2200 x 2480px and a really larger display.
Vivo X Fold 3 Pro features a way better camera than Galaxy S7 edge, and although they both have a same size camera aperture, the vivo X Fold 3 Pro also has a way bigger back camera sensor which gives a much higher photo and video quality, a lot better video resolution and a way better resolution camera.
The vivo X Fold 3 Pro features a much greater storage to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Galaxy S7 edge, because although it has no external memory card slot, it also counts with 512 GB internal storage capacity. The vivo X Fold 3 Pro features a much longer battery performance than Galaxy S7 edge, because it has 5700mAh of battery capacity.
Galaxy S7 edge is not only the best phones between the ones we are comparing here, but it's also very cheap compared to the other phones.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.